Zero rational results are being accomplished by a government or special interest group with enough substance to validate forced multiculturalism, the struggling native populations of these countries are disgracefully overlooked.
Perhaps, the most distressing sign of a rogue government exercising their unmitigated power is the non-democratic advancement of America’s forced multiculturalism policy. This is also a suicidal trend spreading across Europe, suggesting that many powerful leaders may be colluding with each other. American politicians, primarily democrats (publically anyway), are actually encouraging a mass invasion of illegal foreigners, 57%of who are Mexican, to enter the U.S thus entitling them for state welfare, tax-exempt employment, free education, free healthcare and the opportunity to vote in American elections.
Disregard the taxpayer funded entitlements for a moment because the glaring shameful act here is two-fold.
A. Politicians with the balls to portray concerned U.S citizens as bigots when they become outraged by the real prospect of non-citizens voting in a U.S election.
B. The troubling effect that illegal non-citizen voting in an election will precipitate is vast and irreversible. As earlier stated, over half of the illegal traffic is made up of Mexicans. A vast majority of them need and seek out government assistance (they were unsuccessful in their own country) so they’re voting for whoever can provide the most welfare. More than 10% of the women in Mexico are illiterate, which exponentially increases among those in the illegal invader population. The murder rate for this south of the border dwelling in 2018 was over 33,000, for the U.S.in 2017 it was substantially lower at 17,000. In the U.S it dropped in 2018, this is staggering when you realize that the United States population is over327 million people and Mexico has only had 129 million.
Most congressional leaders making policy do so despite a substantial chasm dividing them from the middle class. If the first U.S Naturalization Act serves as a baseline then we can certainly begin to see how congressional policy has evolved throughout our history. The Naturalization Act of 1790 restricted non-white people from becoming citizens. This further advances the theory that the United States was indented to be primarily occupied by “Free” whites that identify with European culture. In 1875 a series of restrictions on immigration were enacted, unlike 2019s intentional reconstitution of the Western identity, these restrictions were intended to proliferate American value. The band included criminals, people with contagious diseases, polygamists, anarchists, beggars and importers of prostitutes. If in 1875 you argued that this was an unfair extension of bigotry and “white privilege, you’d be justifiably laughed out of relevancy and probably lynched for propagating discord. What’s one common reality that ties together each new generation of the West? It’s a moral superiority over those of their previous generation.
Under what authority do politicians act as sole arbiter of a nation’s identity? The arduous balance between liberty and anarchy is a tedious obligation for many people to attempt, however, the United States strengthened by its ties to a European ethos, has always accomplished the task. The Democrats, while being aided by their extendable attack dogs on the left, are obsessed over these policies content to drag America into third world nation status.
It all boils down to an American’s inalienable right to live free, including the freedom to live as sovereign people. This multicultural subversion is an unprecedented affront to American liberties by our elected officials. It is intended to break the back of the middle class, who are predominately white and promote a two-class order, rich and poor. Bulldozing over public opposition is indicative of liberal-democrats, especially when introducing an evasive public policy. However, this would be a difficult feat accomplish once identified by a healthy middle class.
How does the global left benefit by replacing the strong middle class (mostly white) of European nations across the globe? Why is rendering such an iconic class of people so vitally important that they’d sacrifice civilization as we know it? For world dominance? Of course, however, will an attempt to displace the middle class via third world migration succeed? The historically plucky middle-class of people seldom rolls over and has resisted some very inhospitable situations. Initially this multicultural infestation might succeed; eventually though, people will realize that this aggressive act is equivalent to a military advance by a foreign interest.
Zero rational results are being accomplished by a government or special interest group with enough substance to validate forced multiculturalism, the struggling native populations of these countries are disgracefully overlooked. In America, for instance, these unwelcomed intruders deplete the vital resources that minority leaders argue for. The “immigrants” offer nothing to enhance our national interest, nothing that justifies this mass human absorption rife with criminals, drug dealers, murderers, and rapist. So unless the end-game is meant to bolster the department of corrections, social programs, and an overwhelmed and under-educated school system, then we should abandon multiculturalism today.